When collaborating with a coworker who was difficult to please, which approach proved most effective?

• A. I picked my battles and discovered her good ideas, which led to creating a 'Things to do on the East End LI' list for guests' local eats and attractions
• B. I always acceded to their requests to avoid conflict
• C. I avoided communication and worked independently
• D. I suggested replacing them with someone else

Answer: (A)

In collaboration, the most effective approach is to balance assertiveness with openness and turn input into a concrete, shared outcome. Picking battles means focusing on the issues that truly matter and aren’t worth compromising, while still staying engaged enough to shape the project. By uncovering and using the coworker’s good ideas, you show respect for their perspective and create buy-in, which reduces friction and strengthens teamwork. The tangible result—a practical list for guests’ local eats and attractions—gives the collaboration a clear, useful achievement that both of you can rally around and that enhances the guest experience.

Choosing to always give in avoids real quality control and can breed resentment. Avoiding communication and working independently erodes alignment and creates confusion. Suggesting replacing the coworker sidesteps the collaboration and damages trust, offering a quick fix rather than a constructive resolution.